John E. Wall - Page 11




                                       - 11 -                                         

          apart.  The $260.13 value determined in the notices was only 17             
          percent greater than the $221.75 value claimed in the returns.              
               Second, this litigation has not helped the parties settle              
          and compromise their differences; to the contrary, it has                   
          driven the parties further apart.  The overall value of $192.20             
          per share set forth in the revised report of petitioners’ expert            
          Donna J. Walker (Ms. Walker) is lower than the value claimed in             
          the gift tax returns; the overall value of $273.99 per share set            
          forth in the report of respondent’s expert Gary L. Schroeder                
          (Mr. Schroeder) is higher than the value determined in the                  
          statutory notices, although respondent has not asserted an                  
          increased deficiency.7                                                      
               In light of these observations, what the Court had to say in           
          Buffalo Tool & Die Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 441           
          (1980), concerning the “pure factual issue” of valuation, is                
          particularly germane to the cases at hand:                                  
               As the Court repeatedly admonished counsel at trial,                   
               the issue is more properly suited for the give and take                
               of the settlement process than adjudication.  The                      
               existing record reeks of stubbornness rather than                      
               flexibility on the part of both parties, based upon "an                
               overzealous effort * * * to infuse a talismanic                        
               precision" into their respective views as to valuation.                


               7 Notwithstanding their differing conclusions about value,             
          the parties’ experts agree on many important matters concerning             
          the proper measure of Demco’s historical financial performance,             
          the methods to be used to appraise value based on that                      
          performance, and the availability and magnitude of lack of                  
          marketability and nonvoting stock discounts.  See infra p. 38.              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011