Efrain J. and Josefina Xuncax - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          half of the figure claimed.  Since the receipts and invoices                
          which supposedly substantiate petitioners’ “Other costs” total              
          only $5,476, we conclude that they have failed to prove their               
          entitlement to cost of goods sold in excess of what already                 
          appears to be a generous allowance by respondent.                           
               B. Wages Expense                                                       
               On their Schedule C, petitioners designated $50,925 as cost            
          of labor and $6,721 as wages expense.  These amounts add to a               
          total of $57,646 for compensation-related expenditures.  During             
          examination, petitioners provided payroll invoices and receipts             
          for 1996 totaling $55,805.33.  Respondent allowed as a deduction            
          wages expense of $78,100.  Again, respondent would appear to have           
          been generous.  Furthermore, to the extent that certain portions            
          of Mr. Mendez’s testimony and the written statement offered by              
          petitioners at trial can be interpreted to mean that additional             
          cash payments were made to employees, such representations are              
          insufficient to support a further deduction.                                
               First, the record is entirely devoid of anything which could           
          corroborate the self-serving averments that cash payments were in           
          fact made during the year at issue.  Second, even if we were                
          willing to accept that cash had been remitted, the record                   
          provides no basis for a reasonable estimate of the deductible               
          amount.  The oral testimony contains no numerical information               
          whatsoever, as to either the number or the amount of payments,              






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011