Efrain J. and Josefina Xuncax - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
          the record contains a garment manufacturing license fee invoice             
          from the County of Los Angeles for $323.75.  The invoice recites            
          that unless payment is received before December 15, 1996, legal             
          proceedings will be instituted.  Handwritten on the invoice is              
          “pagado con check”, which Mr. Mendez testified he wrote to                  
          signify that the fee was paid by check.  Given this notation and            
          the logical appeal of Mr. Mendez’s testimony that the business              
          would not have been able to continue without the license, we are            
          satisfied that EJX did in fact remit the referenced fee in 1996.            
          Petitioners are entitled to a deduction for licenses in the                 
          amount of $323.75.                                                          
               F.  Advertising                                                        
               Petitioners’ Schedule C reflects a deduction for advertising           
          of $1,329, all of which was disallowed by respondent.  The sole             
          item in the record which would appear to be traceable to an                 
          advertising expenditure is an invoice from Rick Swinger                     
          Photography for “studio fashion photography with model and 6                
          roles color film shot”.  The balance due is shown as $950.                  
          Nonetheless, there are again two barriers to permitting a                   
          deduction based upon this document.  First, as with many of the             
          invoices previously mentioned, the record is barren of any                  
          evidence of actual payment.  Not even a notation on the bill                
          exists to give rise to an inference in petitioners’ favor.                  








Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011