Estate of Frank Armstrong, Jr., Deceased, Frank Armstrong III, Executor - Page 23




                                       - 23 -                                         
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                    In determining the amount of the gross estate, the                
               amount of gift tax paid with respect to transfers made                 
               within 3 years of death are [sic] to be includable in a                
               decedent’s gross estate.  This “gross-up” rule for gift                
               taxes eliminates any incentive to make deathbed                        
               transfers to remove an amount equal to the gift taxes                  
               from the transfer tax base. [H. Rept. 94-1380, at 12,                  
               14 (1976), 1976-3 C.B. (Vol. 3) 735, 746, 748.]                        
               Citing this legislative history, the estate argues that the            
          gross-up rule of section 2035(c) is fundamentally different from            
          the 3-year rule of section 2035(a), which was held to be                    
          constitutional in Estate of Rosenberg v. Commissioner, supra, and           
          Estate of Ekins v. Commissioner, supra.  The estate contends                
          that, unlike the 3-year rule of section 2035(a), the gross-up               
          rule of section 2035(c) is not “prophylactic” but instead                   
          “[ingrains] an element of motive with respect to gift tax paid on           
          lifetime transfers”, because “Congress based its enactment of               
          sec. 2035(c) upon the elimination of a tax avoidance technique by           
          deathbed gifts.”  The result, the estate contends, is that                  
          section 2035(c) “created a conclusive presumption regarding                 
          motive, leaving taxpayers no opportunity to present evidence to             
          the contrary.”  Therefore, the estate concludes, section 2035(c)            
          is unconstitutional under Heiner v. Donnan, 285 U.S. 312 (1932).            
          We disagree.                                                                
               In Estate of Rosenberg v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. at 995-996,            
          this Court observed:                                                        







Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011