David J. Edwards - Page 49




                                       - 49 -                                         
          2001) (“The Internal Revenue Service is a ‘department or agency’            
          of the United States.”).                                                    
               In Malone v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-372, we imposed             
          sanctions totaling $15,000 against the taxpayers for advancing              
          frivolous arguments, including the argument that the Internal               
          Revenue Service is not an agency of the United States:  “Contrary           
          to petitioners’ argument, there is, in fact and in law, an IRS.”            
          In Brandt v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-411, we imposed                  
          section 6673 sanctions of $5,000 for meritless arguments                    
          disputing the Internal Revenue Service’s authority.  Petitioner             
          cited none of these authorities to the Court.                               
               Furthermore, the authorities petitioner cited do not support           
          his argument.  The issue in Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281           
          (1979), was whether Chrysler could maintain an action to enjoin             
          the Secretary of Labor from making public reports that Chrysler,            
          as a Government contractor, was required to file to show                    
          compliance with Federal affirmative action guidelines.  One of              
          the issues considered by the Court was whether disclosure was               
          prohibited by the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. sec. 1905.  The              
          Court noted that the origins of the modern Trade Secrets Act                
          could be traced to an 1864 act barring Government revenue                   
          officers from making unauthorized disclosure of a taxpayer’s                
          business information.  The Court noted that the 1864 Act was                
          repealed in 1948.  In a footnote, the Court made a historical               







Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011