18 actual partners is not a “partnership item” under section 6221 and cannot be addressed in a partnership level proceeding. We do not have jurisdiction under section 6226 to determine the identity of the partners in the two partnership level proceedings. Maxwell v. Commissioner, supra. In the absence of a justiciable claim for relief in the petition for review, we shall dismiss each case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. B. The Notice of Deficiency Issued to the Grigoracis Next we consider the Grigoracis’ request that we review respondent’s determination of a deficiency for the Grigoracis’ 1996 tax year and a related penalty. Respondent initially adopted the position that the notice of deficiency was issued pursuant to section 6212. After the Court requested additional briefing by the parties, respondent claimed that the notice of deficiency is entirely an affected items notice of deficiency under section 6230(a)(2). Respondent argues that the notice was issued before the close of the partnership proceedings and should be dismissed pursuant to GAF Corp. v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 519 (2000). 1. Is the Notice of Deficiency an Affected Items Notice of Deficiency? Pursuant to section 6230(a)(2), the Commissioner will issue an affected items notice of deficiency to the taxpayer when a deficiency is attributable to an affected item that requires aPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011