Victor Grigoraci and Judith A. Grigoraci, et al. - Page 20




                                         20                                           
          deficiency determined by respondent was composed of the self-               
          employment tax on the $124,470 and an accuracy-related penalty              
          for the Grigoracis’ failure to treat Mr. Grigoraci as a partner             
          in GTWP.                                                                    
               The deficiency is not solely attributable to affected items            
          because respondent determined that the Grigoracis owed self-                
          employment tax on income that was not earned by GTWP.  The self-            
          employment tax respondent determined that the Grigoracis owed on            
          the $92,470 is an affected item, while the self-employment tax              
          owed on the $32,000 is not an “affected item”.                              
               Pursuant to GAF Corp. v. Commissioner, supra, we dismiss for           
          lack of jurisdiction and strike the Grigoracis’ petition to the             
          extent the deficiency is related to the self-employment tax on              
          the $92,470 of income or the accuracy-related penalty.  As to the           
          portion of the deficiency that is self-employment tax on the                
          $32,000 of income, the notice was issued pursuant to section                
          6212.  As to this portion of the notice of deficiency, we have              
          jurisdiction to review respondent’s determination under section             
          6213.                                                                       
               2.   Review of the Section 6212 Notice of Deficiency                   
               The notice of deficiency does not clearly articulate the               
          reason for recharacterizing the $32,000.  On brief, respondent’s            
          sole argument in support of collecting self-employment tax on               
          this income is that Grigoraci S Corporation is a sham that should           
          not be recognized for Federal tax purposes.  Accordingly, the               




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011