Estate of Paul Mitchell, Deceased - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
                           SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION                            

               JACOBS, Judge:  This case is before us on remand from the              
          Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  Estate of Mitchell v.              
          Commissioner, 250 F.3d 696 (9th Cir. 2001), affg. 103 T.C. 520              
          (1994) and vacating and remanding T.C. Memo. 1997-461.  The Court           
          of Appeals has directed us to shift the burden of proof to                  
          respondent regarding the determination of additional taxes and to           
          explain our valuation of stock included in decedent’s estate for            
          purposes of Federal estate tax consistent with the standards                
          established in Leonard Pipeline Contractors v. Commissioner, 142            
          F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 1998), revg. and remanding T.C. Memo. 1996-             
          316.1                                                                       
               We incorporate herein the findings of fact set forth in Estate         
          of Mitchell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-461, by this                   
          reference.  For ease of understanding, we herein summarize the              
          relevant facts from that opinion as well as set forth additional            
          findings of fact for the purpose of deciding the issue on remand.           
          The stipulations and exhibits are also incorporated herein by this          
          reference.                                                                  




                                     Background                                       

               1    On remand, in Leonard Pipeline Contractors v.                     
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-315, affd. without published                  
          opinion 210 F.3d 384 (9th Cir. 2000), we reentered our decision.            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011