- 2 - Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal income tax (tax) for 1998 in the amount of $4,763. The issue for decision is whether the $29,000 settlement amount (settlement amount at issue) that petitioner Naylene M. Nield (Ms. Nield) received in 1998 in settlement of a claim against her employer is excludable from petitioners’ gross income under section 104(a)(2). We hold that it is not. Background Most of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. Petitioners resided in Cedar City, Utah, at the time they filed the petition in this case. On September 5, 1989, Ms. Nield began working for Goer Manufacturing, Inc. (Goer). On or about July 9, 1992, Goer terminated her employment. On December 31, 1992, Ms. Nield filed a claim (State claim) against Goer with the State of Utah Industrial Commission, Anti- Discrimination Division (Utah Industrial Commission) consisting of two affidavits by Ms. Nield (Ms. Nield’s affidavits) in which she alleged employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation.2 One of Ms. Nield’s affidavits alleged that “when * * * [Ms. Nield’s supervisor] would walk past me he would lift up his elbow and bump into my breast.” 2Although the record is unclear, it appears that at some time after Ms. Nield filed the State claim, that claim was referred to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011