- 12 - in order to be excluded from gross income, any amounts received must be on account of personal injuries that are physical or sickness that is physical. Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-188, sec. 1605, 110 Stat. 1755, 1838-1839. The 1996 amendment does not otherwise change the requirements of section 104(a)(2) or the analysis set forth in Commissioner v. Schleier, supra; it merely imposes an additional requirement for an amount to qualify for exclusion from gross income under that section. Each of the two independent requirements described in Commissioner v. Schleier, supra, that a taxpayer must satisfy in order to qualify an amount for exclusion from gross income under section 104(a)(2) involves two inquiries that are similar. In the instant case, the dual inquiries under the first requirement are whether Ms. Nield’s underlying claims were based on tort or tort type rights and, if they were, whether such claims gave rise to the payment by Goer of the settlement amount at issue. The dual inquiries under the second requirement are whether Ms. Nield’s alleged injuries were personal and physical in nature and, if so, whether the settlement amount at issue was received on account of such personal physical injuries. Respondent contends that the claims set forth in the com- plaint that Ms. Nield filed in the United States District Court were not based on tort or tort type rights and that Ms. Nield didPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011