Jared R. and Naylene M. Nield - Page 13




                                       - 12 -                                         
          in order to be excluded from gross income, any amounts received             
          must be on account of personal injuries that are physical or                
          sickness that is physical.  Small Business Job Protection Act of            
          1996, Pub. L. 104-188, sec. 1605, 110 Stat. 1755, 1838-1839.  The           
          1996 amendment does not otherwise change the requirements of                
          section 104(a)(2) or the analysis set forth in Commissioner v.              
          Schleier, supra; it merely imposes an additional requirement for            
          an amount to qualify for exclusion from gross income under that             
          section.                                                                    

               Each of the two independent requirements described in                  
          Commissioner v. Schleier, supra, that a taxpayer must satisfy in            
          order to qualify an amount for exclusion from gross income under            
          section 104(a)(2) involves two inquiries that are similar.  In              
          the instant case, the dual inquiries under the first requirement            
          are whether Ms. Nield’s underlying claims were based on tort or             
          tort type rights and, if they were, whether such claims gave rise           
          to the payment by Goer of the settlement amount at issue.  The              
          dual inquiries under the second requirement are whether Ms.                 
          Nield’s alleged injuries were personal and physical in nature               
          and, if so, whether the settlement amount at issue was received             
          on account of such personal physical injuries.                              

               Respondent contends that the claims set forth in the com-              
          plaint that Ms. Nield filed in the United States District Court             
          were not based on tort or tort type rights and that Ms. Nield did           






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011