- 20 -
Although not ordered by the Court, on January 16, 2002,
Richards Management Trust submitted, and the Court had filed, a
response to respondent’s motion to hold petitioner in default in
the case at docket No. 10764-00, and Mr. Richards submitted, and
the Court had filed, a response to respondent’s motion to dismiss
for lack of prosecution in the case at docket No. 10766-00. Each
of those respective responses contained arguments and contentions
that the Court found in an Order dated January 18, 2002 (January
18, 2002 Order) in each of the cases at docket Nos. 10764-00 and
10766-00 to be frivolous and/or groundless. In the respective
January 18, 2002 Orders in those cases, the Court reminded
petitioners about section 6673(a)(1).
6(...continued)
quest as the original petition was issued in error
due to false directions given to petitioner by
respondent. Petitioner believes that he has the
right to correct his mistake and withdraw the
original petition.
2. This Court and the respondent recognize the peti-
tioner as a Trust and cease attempting to set
aside a contract in direct opposition to the Con-
stitution of the United States of America.
3. This court sanction the respondent for using this
Court for illegal purposes. Respondent has no
legal tax claim as petitioner has noted to respon-
dent and this Court on numerous occasions. With-
out a legal claim, respondent fraudulently in-
structed petitioner to use this Court to legiti-
mize his illegal attempt to deprive petitioner of
his assets.
4. This Court instruct the respondent to cease, now
and forever, harassment of petitioner.
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011