- 13 - together with District Counsel’s Motion to the Peti- tioner by overnight mail. Mr. Binge indicated that he would be meeting with the Petitioner to assist him in making a response. The undersigned indicated that he would be available to assist in that effort. On the evening of the 10th [of September 2001] the undersigned mailed the Court’s Order and District Counsel’s Motion to the Petitioner for 10:00 am deliv- ery on the 11th [of September 2001] via Federal Ex- press. It is clear to the undersigned that the Petitioner does not wish to have him continue to represent him. The undersigned has had numerous conversations with him and his accountant. He is aware of the significance of his decision to decline assistance. On September 19, 2001, and September 24, 2001, respectively, the Court granted Mr. Wise’s motion to withdraw in each of the cases at (1) docket Nos. 10765-00 and 10766-00 and (2) docket Nos. 10764-00 and 10767-00. Although the Court’s respective September 4, 2001 Orders directed petitioners in the cases at docket Nos. 10765-00 and 10766-00 to file on or before September 13, 2001, responses to respondent’s respective motions to compel discovery in those cases, the Court received no such responses. On September 19, 2001, the Court issued respective Orders (September 19, 2001 Orders) in the cases at docket Nos. 10765-00 and 10766-00 in which it granted respondent’s respective motions to compel discovery and ordered petitioners to produce on or before Septem- ber 28, 2001, the documents requested in respondent’s requests for production of documents and the answers to respondent’sPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011