Richards Asset Mgmt. Trust, et al. - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          docket Nos. 10765-00 and 10766-00.  On September 24, 2001, Ms.              
          Jackson filed a motion to withdraw in each of the cases at docket           
          Nos. 10764-00 and 10767-00.  As grounds for each such motion, Ms.           
          Jackson stated:                                                             
                    The undersigned [Ms. Jackson] was working out of                  
               the offices of Wise & Associates until June 18, 2001.                  
               At that time, my employment contract was terminated,                   
               and I undertook employment at another firm.  I seek a                  
               release from this court from representing the Peti-                    
               tioner in this matter because I am no longer associated                
               with Wise & Associates.                                                
               On September 18, 2001, and on September 24, 2001, respec-              
          tively, the Court granted Ms. Jackson’s motion to withdraw in               
          each of the cases at (1) docket Nos. 10765-00 and 10766-00 and              
          (2) docket Nos. 10764-00 and 10767-00.                                      
               On September 17, 2001, Mr. Wise filed a motion to withdraw             
          in each of the cases at docket Nos. 10765-00 and 10766-00.  On              
          September 24, 2001, Mr. Wise filed a motion to withdraw in each             
          of the cases at docket Nos. 10764-00 and 10767-00.  In support of           
          Mr. Wise’s motion to withdraw in each such case,4 Mr. Wise repre-           
          sented in pertinent part as follows:                                        
                    In June 2001 the undersigned [Mr. Wise] contacted                 
               the Petitioner and related that although he had filed a                
               petition with the Tax Court, on his behalf, at the                     


               4Mr. Wise’s respective motions to withdraw in the cases at             
          docket Nos. 10764-00 and 10767-00 did not detail the reasons for            
          granting those motions.  Instead, each such motion stated that              
          the reasons for Mr. Wise’s motion to withdraw in each such case             
          were “the same reasons” set forth in Mr. Wise’s respective                  
          motions to withdraw in the cases at docket Nos. 10765-00 and                
          10766-00.                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011