- 6 -
discovery) in each of the cases at docket Nos. 10765-003 and
10766-00. In respondent’s motions to compel discovery in each of
those cases, respondent represented, inter alia, that counsel of
record in each such case, i.e., Ms. Jackson and Mr. Wise, had
informed respondent’s counsel that they no longer represented Mr.
Richards. Respondent further represented in respondent’s respec-
tive motions to compel discovery in the cases at docket Nos.
10765-00 and 10766-00, inter alia, that respondent’s counsel
advised both Ms. Jackson and Mr. Wise that respondent would
continue to recognize them as counsel for petitioner in each such
case unless otherwise notified by the Court.
Respondent attached as exhibits to respondent’s respective
motions to compel discovery in the cases at docket Nos. 10765-00
and 10766-00 respondent’s discovery requests. Those respective
discovery requests included the following interrogatories:
Interrogatory No. 5:
Please identify all trusts by name, address and
EIN, for which either petitioner, or both, were the
creator, grantor, settlor, director or beneficiary or
any trust in which petitioners[1] were involved with
[sic] in any way. For each trust identified, please
state whether the trust has been modified or amended;
and if so, answer the following with regard to each
modification or amendment for each trust:
3Respondent filed discovery motions in the case at docket
No. 10765-00 before respondent filed on Oct. 1, 2001, respon-
dent’s motion to dismiss that case for lack of jurisdiction as to
Joy A. Richards, deceased, and to change caption, which the Court
granted on Oct. 12, 2001.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011