Thomas K. and Billie J. Scallen - Page 36




                                       - 36 -                                         
          1963 Medicor acquisition of the Olmstead County Bank.  He relies            
          solely on his own testimony, which we find less than compelling:            
               Q    Do you recall what fee that was, or the amount of                 
               that fee?                                                              
               A    I believe -- and I’m not sure.  This was a long                   
               time ago.  But I think it was 1 percent of the amount                  
               of the loan.                                                           
          Petitioner also claims that he received a 1 and 3/4-percent fee             
          on what he purports to be South Pacific’s loan of $3 million to             
          Northwest on June 17, 1971.  To support his position, petitioner            
          cites his attorney’s opening statement and an annual report                 
          submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Neither of            
          those items supports petitioner’s position.                                 
               Petitioner suggests for the first time on brief that, with             
          respect to WMG, “If, as the Commissioner suggests, the taxpayer             
          was trying to preserve his income as an officer of the                      
          corporation, then he is entitled to take the deductions as                  
          ordinary losses.”  It is well established that a taxpayer’s                 
          status as an employee is a business interest.  See United States            
          v. Generes, 405 U.S. 93, 101 (1972); Halle v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1983-760.  However, it is a fact that petitioner did not              
          receive wages or other compensation for services from WMG during            
          the period 1987 to 1995.  Thus, it is not plausible that                    
          petitioner made the loan to WMG with the dominant motivation of             
          protecting any business interest as an employee in WMG, and there           







Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011