- 2 - otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Background All of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulated facts are incorporated in our findings by this reference. Petitioners resided in Carey, Ohio, at the time they filed their petition. Petitioners timely filed Forms 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns, for 1996, 1997, and 1998, reporting income received in the amounts of $8,595, $9,593, and $8,618, respectively. On the Form 1040 for 1998, petitioners inserted above their signatures a reference to signing the return “under duress”. On March 30, 2000, respondent sent to petitioners a notice of deficiency, determining deficiencies of $9,621, $6,313, and $4,173 for 1996, 1997, and 1998, respectively, and penalties under section 6662(a) for each of those years. Petitioners did not file a petition in response to the notice of deficiency. In their petition in this case, they acknowledge receipt of the notice of deficiency but claim that it was not valid because it “was not signed by the Secretary of the Treasury or his authorized delegate, and the person who signed the ‘notice of deficiency’ did not have authority to do soPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011