Charles and Teresa Brodman - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal             
          Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule                 
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            
                                     Background                                       
               All of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulated              
          facts are incorporated in our findings by this reference.                   
               Petitioners resided in Carey, Ohio, at the time they filed             
          their petition.                                                             
               Petitioners timely filed Forms 1040, U.S. Individual Income            
          Tax Returns, for 1996, 1997, and 1998, reporting income received            
          in the amounts of $8,595, $9,593, and $8,618, respectively.  On             
          the Form 1040 for 1998, petitioners inserted above their                    
          signatures a reference to signing the return “under duress”.  On            
          March 30, 2000, respondent sent to petitioners a notice of                  
          deficiency, determining deficiencies of $9,621, $6,313, and                 
          $4,173 for 1996, 1997, and 1998, respectively, and penalties                
          under section 6662(a) for each of those years.                              
               Petitioners did not file a petition in response to the                 
          notice of deficiency.  In their petition in this case, they                 
          acknowledge receipt of the notice of deficiency but claim that it           
          was not valid because it “was not signed by the Secretary of the            
          Treasury or his authorized delegate, and the person who signed              
          the ‘notice of deficiency’ did not have authority to do so                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011