Charles and Teresa Brodman - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          withdrawn as counsel.  The taxpayers who continue to pursue those           
          claims are not entitled to a free ride.  We conclude that a                 
          penalty of $5,000 against petitioners should be awarded to the              
          United States in this case.                                                 
               It is particularly egregious for taxpayers to be aided in              
          pursuing frivolous claims by attorneys trained in the law.  A               
          frivolous claim is one that is contrary to established law and              
          unsupported by a meritorious argument for change in the law.                
          See, e.g., Nis Family Trust v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 523, 544              
          (2000); cf. Harper v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 533, 548 (1992).                
          Attorneys who practice in this Court are bound by the ABA Model             
          Rules of Professional Conduct (Model Rules).  Rule 201(a).  Rule            
          3.1 of the Model Rules states in part:                                      
                    A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding,                  
               or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there                 
               is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not                    
               frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an                 
               extension, modification or reversal of existing law.                   
               *  *  *                                                                
               Section 6673(a)(2) provides in part as follow:                         
                         Counsel’s liability for excessive costs.--                   
                    Whenever it appears to the Tax Court that any                     
                    attorney or other person admitted to practice                     
                    before the Tax Court has multiplied the                           
                    proceedings in any case unreasonably and                          
                    vexatiously, the Tax Court may require--                          
                              (A) that such attorney or other person                  
                         pay personally the excess costs, expenses,                   
                         and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred                      
                         because of such conduct * * *                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011