James Benson Dunham and Melanie A. Dunham - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               or individuals named herein are natural born Citizens                  
               of one of the 50 Republic states, under the                            
               Constitution and Law.                                                  
               A hearing pursuant to petitioners’ request was conducted on            
          February 12, 2002, with a court reporter present.  A transcript             
          of the proceedings was made.  A Certificate of Assessments and              
          Payments for 1997 had been mailed to petitioners before the                 
          hearing.  At the hearing attended by petitioner James Benson                
          Dunham (Mr. Dunham), Mr. Jewett repeated his frivolous arguments.           
          Among other things, Mr. Jewett argued:                                      
                    MR. JEWETT: * * * Most importantly, and of course,                
               we’ll get around to this, but I think that it’s                        
               important to make sure that it’s clear from the                        
               beginning that one of the arguments that my clients are                
               making is that they’re not liable for the so-called                    
               income tax.  And I would point out that if one opens                   
               the index to the code, a copy of which I have in front                 
               of me, one will find a listing of many different types                 
               of taxes for which there is liability in the Internal                  
               Revenue Code.  Nowhere, therein, is there a liability                  
               listed for an income tax.                                              
                    HEARING OFFICER GEORGE: Those arguments that your                 
               clients raise in their appeal request and on their form                
               1040s have been refuted by the judicial authorities and                
               have been called frivolous.  And I’m going to hand to                  
               you and your client News Release Number IR-2001-59.                    
               That gives you an idea and lists the cases that have                   
               made similar arguments such as those that you’re making                
               today and those that you have made.  The Tax Court has                 
               determined that those types of arguments are frivolous                 
               and it could cost your client more money if you                        
               advocate in court the same arguments that you’re                       
               advocating today because the taxpayers and their                       
               representatives who make those kinds of arguments are                  
               being sanctioned.                                                      
                    MR. JEWETT: Well, let me just say this, in                        
               response to that, Ms. George.  I think you’ll agree                    
               with me that James and Melanie Dunham’s name is not                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011