- 9 -
reminded of the consequences if he repeats or persists in similar
claims in the future. See sec. 6673(a)(2); Takaba v.
Commissioner, 119 T.C. 285, 296-305 (2002); Edwards v.
Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-149.
In reaching our holdings herein, we have considered all
arguments made, and to the extent not mentioned above, we
conclude them to be moot, irrelevant, or without merit.
To reflect the foregoing,
An appropriate
decision will be entered.
4(...continued)
the Tax Court that any attorney or other
person admitted to practice before the
Tax Court has multiplied the proceedings
in any case unreasonably and
vexatiously, the Tax Court may require--
(A) that such attorney or other person
pay personally the excess costs, expenses,
and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred
because of such conduct * * *
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: May 25, 2011