- 9 - reminded of the consequences if he repeats or persists in similar claims in the future. See sec. 6673(a)(2); Takaba v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 285, 296-305 (2002); Edwards v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-149. In reaching our holdings herein, we have considered all arguments made, and to the extent not mentioned above, we conclude them to be moot, irrelevant, or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate decision will be entered. 4(...continued) the Tax Court that any attorney or other person admitted to practice before the Tax Court has multiplied the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously, the Tax Court may require-- (A) that such attorney or other person pay personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct * * *Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: May 25, 2011