James Benson Dunham and Melanie A. Dunham - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          penalty of $5,000 under section 6673 was imposed upon the                   
          taxpayers.                                                                  
               Similarly, petitioners did not raise any bona fide issues or           
          collection alternatives.  Rather, petitioners presented a                   
          “hodgepodge of unsupported assertions, irrelevant platitudes and            
          legalistic gibberish” similar to those previously rejected by               
          this Court.  Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417, 1418 (5th Cir.           
          1984); see Brodman v. Commissioner, supra; Kish v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 1998-16; Fisher v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-277.            
          “We perceive no need to refute these arguments with somber                  
          reasoning and copious citation of precedent; to do so might                 
          suggest that these arguments have some colorable merit”.  Crain             
          v. Commissioner, supra at 1417.  The Court rejects these                    
          boilerplate tax-protester types of arguments as frivolous and               
          without merit.  As a result, we hold that respondent did not                
          abuse his discretion in determining that collection should                  
          proceed.                                                                    
               In the instant case, petitioners were specifically warned on           
          two occasions of the likelihood of a penalty under section                  
          6673(a)(1) if they continued with these arguments.3  Despite the            

               3  Sec. 6673(a)(1) provides:                                           
                    (1) Procedures instituted primarily for delay, etc.--             
               Whenever it appears to the Tax Court that--                            
                         (A) proceedings before it have been instituted or            
                                                              (continued...)          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011