David J. Edwards - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          and cost of goods sold claimed on Schedule C, Profit or Loss From           
          Business.                                                                   
               The parties also stipulated that petitioner failed to report           
          income of $62,061 in 1997, and that petitioner is entitled to               
          deductions on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of $21,929 for               
          1996 and $21,061 for 1997, subject to any statutory limitations             
          based on petitioner’s adjusted gross income.  The parties                   
          stipulated that petitioner is subject to self-employment tax and            
          is entitled to a deduction for one-half of the self-employment              
          tax and that the exemption and taxability of petitioner’s Social            
          Security receipts are computational and depend on petitioner’s              
          adjusted gross income.                                                      
               Finally, the parties agreed that the only issues remaining             
          in dispute were petitioner’s failure to report $170,619 of income           
          in 1996;3 petitioner’s right to Schedule C deductions and cost of           
          goods sold in 1996, airplane expenses, and a home office                    
          deduction; and accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a).            
          In addition to those five issues, respondent requested in his               
          posttrial brief that we impose penalties against petitioner under           
          section 6673(a)(1). Petitioner objected to the imposition of                
          section 6673(a)(1) penalties, contending that his arguments were            


               3On brief, respondent conceded that petitioner’s unreported            
          income for 1996 was $54,516, rather than $170,619; our opinion              
          sustained respondent’s concession to this effect, as well as                
          respondent’s other adjustments that remained in issue.                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011