Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
               A taxpayer on the cash basis is on that basis uniformly                
               as to both receipts and deductions, and he cannot be                   
               permitted any irregular and sporadic variation from                    
               that basis.  The accruing and returning as income of                   
               the interest, therefore, in the earlier years before it                
               was actually received was not, in accordance with                      
               petitioner’s system of accounting, a charging of it on.                
               Interest is charged on under the regulations and the                   
               decisions when the taxpayer is on a cash basis only                    
               when it is actually received.  It is charged on when                   
               the taxpayer is on an accrual basis only when it is                    
               properly accrued.  The conditions for a bad debt                       
               charge-off not being met here, the claim for it was                    
               properly disallowed.  [Id. at 714.]                                    
          Petitioner relies on these statements and contends that “the                
          court’s decision in W.L. Moody Cotton Co. explicitly holds that a           
          taxpayer’s method of tax accounting must be consistently applied            
          for basis purposes.”  We might agree with petitioner’s contention           
          that W.L. Moody Cotton Co. requires consistency in accounting for           
          items of income and deduction.  However, we cannot agree that               
          W.L. Moody Cotton Co. supports increasing petitioner’s regular              
          adjusted cost basis for interest accrued when petitioner was tax            
          exempt.  Nothing in W.L. Moody Cotton Co. supports that position.           
          Indeed, the statements petitioner relies on were made in the                
          context of a broader discussion by the Court of Appeals of the              
          requirement that interest be properly “charged on” before it be             
          allowed as a bad debt deduction:                                            
               As to the first question, the deduction for loss of                    
               interest as a bad debt loss, Art. 23(k)2 of Regulation                 
               94 provides in part:  “Worthless debts arising from                    
               unpaid wages, salaries, rents and similar items of                     
               taxable income will not be allowed as a deduction                      
               unless the income such items represent has been                        
               included in the return of income for the year for which                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011