E.J. Harrison and Sons, Inc. - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
          deductible compensation; and (5) whether the compensation was               
          paid pursuant to a structured, formal and consistently applied              
          program.  Id. at 1245-1248; see also LabelGraphics, Inc. v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-343, affd. 221 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir.            
          2000) (the Elliotts, Inc. factors).                                         
                  2.  Need To Apply the Elliotts, Inc. Factors                        
               In this case, respondent’s conclusion that petitioner’s                
          purported compensation payments to Mrs. Harrison constituted                
          disguised dividends to the extent of the disallowed amounts is              
          based, in large part, upon his conclusion that total payments               
          were well in excess of the amounts that may be considered                   
          reasonable compensation for the services Mrs. Harrison performed            
          on petitioner’s behalf.  Therefore, we must determine                       
          reasonableness in terms of the Elliotts, Inc. factors.                      
                  3.  Expert Reports                                                  
                  a.  Introduction                                                    
               Both parties offered expert testimony in support of their              
          respective positions.                                                       
               In deciding the reasonableness of compensation, courts often           
          look to the opinions of expert witnesses.  Nonetheless, we are              
          not bound by the opinion of any expert witness, and we may accept           
          or reject expert testimony in the exercise of sound judgment.               
          Helvering v. Natl. Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 282, 295 (1938); Estate            
          of Newhouse v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 193, 217 (1990).  Although             
          we may accept the opinion of an expert in its entirety, see                 




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011