E.J. Harrison and Sons, Inc. - Page 26

                                       - 26 -                                         
          testified that, during the audit years, she worked more than 40             
          hours per week on behalf of petitioner.  Her principal                      
          involvement with petitioner consisted of:  (1) Attending weekly             
          board meetings; (2) attending, as a representative of petitioner,           
          chamber of commerce meetings and various community functions and            
          events in the cities served by petitioner; and (3) executing her            
          personal guaranty relating to the line of credit extended to                
          petitioner by Bank of America.  Mrs. Harrison’s other activities,           
          such as filing and maintaining historic company records, signing            
          checks presented to her for the payment of bills, and attending             
          occasional meetings with drivers or other rank and file                     
          employees, were either ministerial in nature or so sporadic as to           
          justify no more than a small fraction of the payments to her                
          during the audit years.  We will consider each of her three                 
          principal functions in turn.                                                
                  (1)  Weekly Board Meetings                                          
               The weekly board meeting discussions covered matters of                
          importance in the conduct of petitioner’s business, and they                
          often culminated in a board vote on whether to go ahead with a              
          proposed transaction.  Although Mrs. Harrison, her three sons,              
          and other witnesses all characterized Mrs. Harrison as the final            
          arbiter of all major business decisions, it is clear that, under            
          petitioner’s bylaws, she was one of four members of the board,              
          each of whom had an equal vote.  Thus, Mrs. Harrison possessed no           
          power to veto a decision agreed to by her sons.  What the                   




Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011