- 18 - its 1995 fiscal year. Since we conclude that this adjustment should not have been made, Mr. Heebink’s valuation analysis significantly understates the value of HII stock. For HII’s 1995 fiscal year, Mr. Heebink adjusted HII’s cost of sales upward and thus its earnings figures downward by approximately $2.5 million. He used this adjusted cost of sales in developing his cost of sales assumption for his discounted cashflow analysis and the adjusted earnings amount in his market comparable analysis. This adjustment was made on the basis of information contained in a 1997 memorandum from personnel at HII to Mr. Heebink regarding a purported overstatement of 1995 income attributable to an alleged understatement of reserves for expenses associated with machine construction projects for 1995. We cannot agree that Mr. Heebink properly adjusted earnings to account for the alleged understatement. Petitioners have not established the existence of an understatement of reserves for 1995, the nature of the understatement, or its amount. We cannot conclude from the evidence presented that a hypothetical buyer or seller would have discovered, or even considered, the understatement of reserves in 1995, at the time of the gift. Indeed, the 1997 memorandum from HII personnel that Mr. Heebink relied upon in making the adjustment states rather equivocally:Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011