Johann T. and Johanna Hess - Page 38

                                       - 38 -                                         
          contend that Mr. Engstrom should have used other measures of                
          comparison besides P/E ratios.                                              
               We agree with petitioners that Mr. Engstrom’s guideline                
          companies method would have been more complete and more                     
          persuasive if it had employed additional measures of comparison.            
          See Wall v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-75.  However, it is               
          clear that P/E ratios bear a well-recognized relationship in the            
          valuation of companies, Learner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-           
          122, and Mr. Engstrom’s reliance on P/E ratios was not inherently           
          flawed.35  Petitioners base their objections to Mr. Engstrom’s              
          analysis on his failure to consider certain pretax methods of               
          comparison such as EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) or             


               35The P/E ratios of publicly held companies do not compare             
          to the P/E ratios of a closely held company if the companies                
          themselves are not comparable.  Learner v. Commissioner, T.C.               
          Memo. 1983-122.  Whether the stock price of one company with a              
          given earnings stream will be similar to that of another company            
          with the same earnings depends upon a wide variety of factors,              
          including management policy, management ability, past                       
          performance, and dividend policy.  Id.  Although petitioners                
          suggest that the guideline companies do not compare to HII, we              
          point out that two of the four guideline companies used by Mr.              
          Engstrom in his analysis, Giddings & Lewis, Inc., and Monarch               
          Machine Tool Co., were companies used by HII to “benchmark” its             
          performance; three of the four guideline companies used by Mr.              
          Engstrom, Cincinnati Milacron, Inc., Giddings & Lewis, Inc., and            
          Monarch Machine Tool Co., were also used by Mr. Heebink in his              
          market comparable analysis; and the remaining company, Gleason              
          Corp., builds machines for the manufacture of gears, and its                
          major customers are in the automotive and truck industries.  Mr.            
          Engstrom made appropriate adjustments to the P/E ratios from the            
          guideline companies to account for differences in size and net              
          profit margins.  With these adjustments, we find the companies              
          selected by Mr. Engstrom comparable to HII.                                 




Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011