Marianne Hopkins - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          respondent assessed.3  Respondent filed notices of Federal tax              
          lien with the county recorder of Marin County, California,                  
          relating to those assessments.  The tax liabilities for 1982 and            
          1983 remain unpaid.                                                         
               On February 8, 1995, petitioner filed a chapter 7                      
          bankruptcy.  She also filed an adversary complaint in the U.S.              
          Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, Santa             
          Rosa Division, in which she sought to be relieved of her joint              
          and several tax liabilities, and the related tax liens, for 1982            
          and 1983 under former section 6013(e).  The Government filed a              
          motion for summary judgment, arguing, inter alia, that petitioner           
          was barred from seeking relief because she had executed a closing           
          agreement under section 7121 with respect to the Far West                   
          Drilling adjustments.  The bankruptcy court granted the                     
          Government’s motion, concluding that petitioner was precluded by            
          the closing agreement from asserting a claim for relief under               
          section 6013(e).  Petitioner appealed from that judgment to a               
          Federal District Court.  The District Court affirmed the                    
          bankruptcy court’s decision.  Hopkins v. United States (In re               
          Hopkins), 79 AFTR 2d 97-2625, 97-1 USTC par. 50,446 (N.D. Cal.              
          1997).  Petitioner then appealed to the Court of Appeals for the            



               3The increase in tax for 1982 was the product of both the              
          adjustment to the partnership deduction that petitioner and Mr.             
          Hopkins claimed for that year and the recomputation of a certain            
          NOL carryforward deduction they claimed for 1982.                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011