Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Subsidiaries - Page 81




                                       - 81 -                                         
          Merrill Parent’s board of directors.  As described in those                 
          written summaries, the cross-chain sales of the issuing                     
          corporations’ stock and the sales of the target corporations were           
          part of the same seamless web of corporate activity intended by             
          petitioner to culminate in the sale of the target corporations              
          outside the consolidated group.  Under the test prescribed by               
          this Court in Niedermeyer v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 280 (1974),              
          and other cases discussed herein, respondent properly integrated            
          the cross-chain sales with the related sales of the target                  
          corporations to ascertain the tax consequences of the                       
          transactions, and we sustain respondent’s determination.                    
               We have considered the other arguments of the parties, and,            
          to the extent not discussed herein, we conclude that the                    
          arguments are irrelevant, moot, or without merit.                           
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          


















Page:  Previous  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  

Last modified: May 25, 2011