Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Subsidiaries - Page 63




                                       - 63 -                                         
          1976, the taxpayer sold all of his shares to a third party for              
          cash and a promissory note.  Minutes of a board of directors                
          meeting held on July 30, 1976, described the redemption and the             
          subsequent sale of taxpayer’s remaining stock to a third party as           
          steps in the sale.  The taxpayer reported the redemption proceeds           
          as income from the sale or exchange of stock under section                  
          302(a).                                                                     
               Citing Zenz v. Quinlivan, 213 F.2d 914 (6th Cir. 1954), this           
          Court examined the record to determine whether the intent of the            
          taxpayer was to bring about a complete liquidation of his                   
          ownership interest in his corporation.  Monson v. Commissioner,             
          supra at 835-836.  Because the record clearly established that              
          the redemption of the taxpayer’s stock was part of an overall               
          plan to terminate his entire interest in his closely held                   
          corporation, this Court held that the redemption was either a               
          complete termination of the taxpayer’s interest under section               
          302(b)(3) or was not essentially equivalent to a dividend under             
          section 302(b)(1).  Id. at 837.  In either event, section 302(a)            
          required the redemption to be treated as a sale.  Id.                       
                    8.  Applicable Legal Principles                                   
               The above-cited cases decided by this Court confirm that               
          this Court has not integrated a redemption with one or more other           
          transactions to decide whether the requirements of section 302(b)           
          are met unless the redemption was part of a firm and fixed plan             






Page:  Previous  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011