- 12 - 22. That the Petitioner believes that he will be removed as President and Director of Stone Manufactur- ing with great loss in salary and will cause him irrep- arable harm. * * * * * * * WHEREFORE, having fully petitioned the Court, the Petitioner, C. Rivers Stone, prays that the Court issue its Order restraining E.E. Stone, IV, John J. Brausch, Stone Manufacturing Company and Stones, Inc. from: 1. Withdrawing or reducing the compensation of the Petitioner, C. Rivers Stone * * * 2. Removing the Petitioner, C. Rivers Stone, as Pres- ident of Stone Manufacturing Company and Stones, Inc.; 3. Removing the Petitioner, C. Rivers Stone, as a Director of Stone Manufacturing Company and Stones, Inc.; and 4. Allowing E.E. Stone, IV from voting the stock on behalf of Stones, Inc. On September 13, 1993, C. Rivers Stone filed a motion (C. Rivers Stone’s motion) in the Probate Court seeking an immediate restraining order, as requested in C. Rivers Stone’s petition, against Eugene Earle Stone, IV, Mr. Brausch, Stone Manufacturing, and Stones, Inc. On September 13, 1993, the Probate Court granted C. Rivers Stone’s motion. The parties in the litigation among the children attempted to minimize any publicity about that litigation. However, that litigation was hotly contested and became very bitter.6 As a 6The litigation among the children was so contentious that even Ms. Morris and Ms. Fraser, who, along with their respective (continued...)Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011