Wells Fargo & Company (f.k.a. Norwest Corporation) and Subsidiaries - Page 50




                                                - 50 -                                                  
            when the reserve is created and the date the employee becomes a                             
            covered employee.  Essentially, this is the individual level                                
            premium cost method with the date of the creation of the reserve                            
            substituted for the date the plan is instituted.  When the year in                          
            which the allocation is first recognized is after the employee has                          
            retired, there are no future years to which the benefits may be                             
            allocated.  Since there are no future years to which the benefits                           
            may be allocated, there are no future normal costs, and the entire                          
            present value of the projected benefit is properly allocated to the                         
            first year.  This is the method that Mercer used in computing                               
            Norwest’s contribution for 1991, the year the reserve was created.                          
                  The individual level premium cost method comports with our                            
            holding that the amount of the liability that may be satisfied by                           
            the reserve is the amount at the time with respect to which the                             
            reserve is computed that, together with future normal costs and                             
            interest, will be sufficient upon retirement of an employee to pay                          
            future medical claims of the employee when they become due.  See,                           
            e.g., United States v. Atlas Life Ins. Co., supra; Travelers Ins.                           
            Co. v. United States, supra; Best Life Assur. Co. v. Commissioner,                          
            281 F.3d 828, 830 (9th Cir. 2002), affg. T.C. Memo. 2000-134; Natl.                         
            States Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, supra; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v.                             
            Commissioner, 96 T.C. 61, 110 (1991), revd. on other grounds 972                            
            F.2d 858 (7th Cir. 1992).                                                                   








Page:  Previous  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011