- 56 - was created to achieve Burton’s goal of having ERG show a consistent paper profit of approximately $75,000.50 For example, ERG’s records show that in 1991 ERG incurred $1,539,463 for “engineering services” provided by NPI. Assuming, as Burton testified, that NPI charged ERG $300 per hour, Burton would have had to spend 5,131.5 hours or 213.8 twenty-four hour periods performing so-called engineering services. On brief, petitioners argue that the percentage of ownership determined in the arbitration decisions affects the issue of what amount, if any, constitutes taxable income to the Bensons. Petitioners direct the Court’s attention to the arbitrators’ finding that Burton owned one-third of NPI’s stock during the years at issue. Thus, petitioners conclude, if one-third of the distributive share rights in NPI is considered, the Bensons overpaid their income tax liability. We disagree. The fact that Burton did not actually own 100 percent of NPI during the years at issue does not affect our holding that those ERG funds transferred to NPI constituted constructive dividends to Burton. The arbitrators found and the parties agree that during the years at issue, Burton maintained sole operating 50On brief, petitioners argue: “The allocations of income to NPI for the engineering services that Burton performed for ERG respecting the Hercules contract were legitimate business accounting decisions.” (Emphasis added.)Page: Previous 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011