Eric B. Benson, et al. - Page 56

                                       - 56 -                                         
          was created to achieve Burton’s goal of having ERG show a                   
          consistent paper profit of approximately $75,000.50  For example,           
          ERG’s records show that in 1991 ERG incurred $1,539,463 for                 
          “engineering services” provided by NPI.  Assuming, as Burton                
          testified, that NPI charged ERG $300 per hour, Burton would have            
          had to spend 5,131.5 hours or 213.8 twenty-four hour periods                
          performing so-called engineering services.                                  
               On brief, petitioners argue that the percentage of ownership           
          determined in the arbitration decisions affects the issue of what           
          amount, if any, constitutes taxable income to the Bensons.                  
          Petitioners direct the Court’s attention to the arbitrators’                
          finding that Burton owned one-third of NPI’s stock during the               
          years at issue.  Thus, petitioners conclude, if one-third of the            
          distributive share rights in NPI is considered, the Bensons                 
          overpaid their income tax liability.  We disagree.                          
               The fact that Burton did not actually own 100 percent of NPI           
          during the years at issue does not affect our holding that those            
          ERG funds transferred to NPI constituted constructive dividends             
          to Burton.  The arbitrators found and the parties agree that                
          during the years at issue, Burton maintained sole operating                 




               50On brief, petitioners argue:  “The allocations of income             
          to NPI for the engineering services that Burton performed for ERG           
          respecting the Hercules contract were legitimate business                   
          accounting decisions.”  (Emphasis added.)                                   





Page:  Previous  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011