- 57 - control of ERG and NPI.51 The record clearly demonstrates that ERG funds transferred to NPI were used for Burton’s family’s economic benefit and otherwise lacked a business purpose. Furthermore, petitioners argue: “Respondent has not presented compelling evidence that Burton appropriated NPI’s bank accounts to his own benefit.” Again, we disagree. The record demonstrates, and indeed as the arbitrators also found, that Burton transferred ERG money to NPI and then used this money for the sole and exclusive benefit of himself and his family. Glendon received no benefit from his determined ownership rights in NPI or ERG until after the final arbitration decision. As he testified, after June 1987 neither he nor Aker had any involvement with ERG. That issue was at the very heart of the brothers’ dispute during the arbitration proceedings. As we discuss infra, the Bensons received a substantial economic benefit from the ERG funds transferred to NPI. Accordingly, we find and hold52 that the ERG transfers to NPI 51Petitioners asked us to find as fact that: All of the funds at issue that were transferred from ERG to NPI were deposited in an NPI bank account * * * over which Burton exercised sole authority and control as president of NPI responsible to its shareholders. [Emphasis added.] 52Our use of the term “find and hold” in this opinion means that we have determined that a preponderance of evidence supports our conclusion.Page: Previous 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011