Eric B. Benson, et al. - Page 57

                                       - 57 -                                         
          control of ERG and NPI.51  The record clearly demonstrates that             
          ERG funds transferred to NPI were used for Burton’s family’s                
          economic benefit and otherwise lacked a business purpose.                   
               Furthermore, petitioners argue:  “Respondent has not                   
          presented compelling evidence that Burton appropriated NPI’s bank           
          accounts to his own benefit.”  Again, we disagree.  The record              
          demonstrates, and indeed as the arbitrators also found, that                
          Burton transferred ERG money to NPI and then used this money for            
          the sole and exclusive benefit of himself and his family.                   
          Glendon received no benefit from his determined ownership rights            
          in NPI or ERG until after the final arbitration decision.  As he            
          testified, after June 1987 neither he nor Aker had any                      
          involvement with ERG.  That issue was at the very heart of the              
          brothers’ dispute during the arbitration proceedings.                       
               As we discuss infra, the Bensons received a substantial                
          economic benefit from the ERG funds transferred to NPI.                     
          Accordingly, we find and hold52 that the ERG transfers to NPI               



               51Petitioners asked us to find as fact that:                           
               All of the funds at issue that were transferred from                   
               ERG to NPI were deposited in an NPI bank account * * *                 
               over which Burton exercised sole authority and control                 
               as president of NPI responsible to its shareholders.                   
               [Emphasis added.]                                                      
               52Our use of the term “find and hold” in this opinion means            
          that we have determined that a preponderance of evidence supports           
          our conclusion.                                                             





Page:  Previous  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011