- 6 - Act II. Discussion A. Did Petitioner Carry on His Playwriting With a Profit Motive? Respondent noted in his pretrial memorandum that petitioner is aggressive in claiming deductions: Year Sch. C Receipts Sch. C Expenses 1993 $ 0.00 $ 27,924.00 1996 0.00 23,353.00 1997 0.00 24,703.00 1998 0.00 33,093.00 1999 0.00 27,128.00 Petitioner argues that this is nothing more than a consequence of the long time it takes many artists to realize a return on their investment of time and money. He contends that he has consistently intended to profit from his playwriting. At trial he offered evidence of various rewards he has already received, including cash bonuses, an increase in salary, travel opportunities, and professional recognition. He maintains that he expects to achieve even more dramatic success, and he was sincerely buoyed in his hopes by many now-famous artists who achieved renown posthumously.13 Respondent, noting that the deductions seem to offset most 13 Petitioner also suggested that the deductions at issue were unreimbursed employee expenses, but he did not fully develop this argument at trial. Those expenses we identify as deductible we allow as playwriting expenses.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011