Gerald L. and Jessica P. Frey - Page 39

                                       - 39 -                                         
          penalty on petitioners under section 6673(a)(1), the Court will             
          sua sponte determine whether to impose such a penalty.  Section             
          6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require a taxpayer to pay to             
          the United States a penalty in an amount not to exceed $25,000              
          whenever it appears to the Court, inter alia, that a proceeding             
          before it was instituted or maintained primarily for delay, sec.            
          6673(a)(1)(A), or that the taxpayers’ position in such a                    
          proceeding is frivolous or groundless, sec. 6673(a)(1)(B).                  
               In Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 581 (2000), we               
          issued an unequivocal warning to taxpayers concerning the                   
          imposition of a penalty under section 6673(a)(1) on those                   
          taxpayers who abuse the protections afforded by sections 6320 and           
          6330 by instituting or maintaining actions under those sections             
          primarily for delay or by taking frivolous or groundless                    
          positions in such actions.  The Court’s May 29, 2003 Order                  
          reminded petitioners about section 6673(a)(1).  Before the trial            
          in this case began, the Court again reminded petitioners about              
          section 6673(a)(1) and indicated that if petitioners advanced               
          frivolous and/or groundless arguments at trial, the Court would             
          impose a penalty on them under that section.  During the trial,             
          upon questioning by the Court, Mr. Frey indicated that                      
          petitioners continue to adhere to the statements, contentions,              
          arguments, requests, and questions set forth in petitioners’                
          attachment to petitioners’ 1996 Form 1040 and petitioners                   






Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011