PDV America, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
               In JFM, Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-239,             
          this Court concluded that gasoline canopies used in marketing               
          petroleum products were not “land improvements” within the                  
          meaning of asset class 57.1 and should be classified under asset            
          class 57.0.  To determine the proper characterization of the                
          canopies, we considered whether the canopies were inherently                
          permanent structures.  We applied the following six factors                 
          articulated in Whiteco Indus., Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at               
          672-673:                                                                    
               (1) Is the property capable of being moved, and has it                 
               in fact been moved?  * * *                                             
               (2) Is the property designed or constructed to remain                  
               permanently in place?  * * *                                           
               (3) Are there circumstances which tend to show the                     
               expected or intended length of affixation, i.e., are                   
               there circumstances which show that the property may or                
               will have to be moved?  * * *                                          
               (4) How substantial a job is removal of the property                   
               and how time-consuming is it?  Is it “readily                          
               removable”?  * * *                                                     
               (5) How much damage will the property sustain upon its                 
               removal?  * * *                                                        
               (6) What is the manner of affixation of the property to                
               the land?  * * *  [Citations omitted.]                                 
          In addition, we observed that, although no single Whiteco factor            
          is decisive, each factor is probative to some extent.  JFM, Inc.            
          & Subs. v. Commissioner, supra.                                             
               Petitioner contends that the tanks are not inherently                  
          permanent structures.  According to petitioner’s application of             





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011