Ragnhild A. Westby - Page 83

                                       - 83 -                                         
               B.  Negligence Addition to Tax Under Section 6653                      
               Section 6653(a), applicable to petitioner’s 1987 and 1988              
          taxable years, authorizes the imposition of an addition to tax              
          for negligence.  It provides that, if any part of any                       
          underpayment is due to negligence or disregard of rules or                  
          regulations, an addition equal to the sum of 5 percent of the               
          underpayment and, for 1987, an amount equal to 50 percent of the            
          interest payable under section 6601 with respect to the portion             
          of such underpayment attributable to negligence for the period              
          from the underpayment due date to the assessment date (or if                
          earlier, the tax payment date) shall be added to the tax.  For              
          purposes of section 6653(a), negligence is defined to include               
          “any failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the                
          provisions of this title”, and disregard is defined to include              
          “any careless, reckless, or intentional disregard.”  Sec.                   
          6653(a)(3).                                                                 
               Respondent contends that petitioner is liable for the                  
          section 6653(a) addition to tax for negligence “because she                 
          failed to use reasonable care in ascertaining and reporting her             
          tax liabilities” for 1987 and 1988.  Specifically, respondent               
          argues that petitioner is liable for the addition to tax because            
          she “failed to keep adequate accounting records and claimed a               
          large NOL deduction with little or no support.”  Respondent does            
          not argue, however, that petitioner’s failure to file timely                






Page:  Previous  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011