Ragnhild A. Westby - Page 87

                                       - 87 -                                         
               We hold that petitioner is not liable for the addition to              
          tax under section 6653(a) for any of the years at issue.                    
               C.  Accuracy-Related Penalty Under Section 6662                        
               Section 6662, applicable to petitioner’s 1989 and 1990                 
          years, authorizes the imposition of a 20-percent penalty for                
          specified types of misconduct, including negligence or disregard            
          of rules or regulations.  Sec. 6662(a) and (b).  Section 6662(c)            
          adopts the same definitions of “negligence” and “disregard” as              
          those utilized in section 6653 before its repeal.                           
               Respondent contends that petitioner is liable for the                  
          accuracy-related penalty for 1989 and 1990 due to her alleged               
          negligent record keeping and makes the same arguments with                  
          respect to section 6662 that he made with respect to section                
          6653.  Consequently, we incorporate by reference our discussion             
          of respondent’s arguments under section 6653,21 and we hold that            
          petitioner did not negligently fail to maintain required records,           
          as respondent contends.                                                     







               21Neither party raised or addressed the issue of whether               
          both the addition to tax under sec. 6651 and the accuracy-related           
          penalty may be applied to the underpayment for a taxable year in            
          which the taxpayer failed to file a timely return.  Consequently,           
          we do not discuss the issue even though it may provide an                   
          alternative ground for decision.                                            





Page:  Previous  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011