- 82 - Fair Market Value Equipment Nov. 1, 1994 Aug. 31, 1995 Sept. 28, 1995 K-Mart $1,651,272 $1,093,247 $1,041,105 Shared 2,396,764 1,394,450 1,188,847 Daley further opined that, as of September 28, 1995, the K- Mart and Shared equipment would have the following estimated residual values on the dates shown below and could be expected to produce no rental income during the purported over lease residual interest periods, as follows: Estimated Residual Value 3-1-97 7-1-97 or or Over Lease Int. Pds.1 Equipment 4-1-97 8-1-97 5-1-00 Proj. Rental Income K-Mart -- $378,486 $194 -0- Shared $120,920 -- -0- -0- 1The over lease periods are: (1) From Nov. 1, 2002, through Feb. 28, 2004, in the case of the K-Mart equipment, and (2) from May 1, 2000, through Feb. 28, 2002, in the case of the Shared equipment. b. Evaluation and Comparison of the Experts In many respects, the experts’ reports were terse and lacking in adequate detail and explanation. In particular, Svoboda’s opinions as to fair market value and projected future rental income were premised on questionable and purely speculative judgments. We found Daley’s report to be short on some details, but more objective and less speculative. Although Svoboda agreed with Daley that the Shared computer equipment would have no value by the start of the residual lease period, Svoboda claimed “it would be reasonable” to expect thatPage: Previous 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011