CMA Consolidated, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Inc. - Page 122

                                       - 88 -                                         
          money debt.  Waddell v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 848, 901-903                  
          (1986), affd. 841 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1988).  We have held that              
          recourse notes were not to be treated as bona fide debt for tax             
          purposes where the possibility that the notes would be paid was             
          illusory and no actual intent existed to pay them.  Ferrell v.              
          Commissioner, 90 T.C. 1154, 1186-1190 (1988); Durham Farms #1,              
          J.V. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-159, affd. 59 Fed. Appx.              
          952 (9th Cir. 2003).                                                        
               The purported debt issued in connection with the first and             
          second lease strip deals is not valid indebtedness.  With respect           
          to the $4,056,220 Jenrich equipment installment note and the                
          $10,000 and $1,000 Lexington notes issued to CMACM, there was no            
          bona fide intent to pay or to enforce those purported debt                  
          obligations on the part of the issuers and holders of the notes.            
          Mallin (who advised Jenrich and was instrumental in bringing                
          about Jenrich’s involvement in the second lease strip deal                  
          transactions) and Koehler (Lexington’s sole shareholder)                    
          essentially viewed Jenrich’s and Lexington’s participation in               
          those second lease strip deal transactions as an accommodation to           
          petitioner and Crispin.                                                     
               It is also highly questionable whether Jenrich and Lexington           
          possessed sufficient financial resources to meet their respective           
          “debt obligations”.  In any event, the Jenrich “note payments”              
          equaled, coincided with, and were completely offset by the                  






Page:  Previous  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011