- 111 -
Two of the items of correspondence that petitioner cites as
“related documents” are dated after December 31, 1985. FPL’s
letter to the NRC is dated July 18, 1986, and the NRC’s letter to
FPL’s nuclear energy department is dated December 5, 1986. To
qualify as transition property under the supply or service
contract rule, the specifications and amount of property must be
readily identifiable by December 31, 1985. Sec. 49(e)(1); TRA
sec. 204(a)(3). Even had these documents readily identified the
specifications and the amount of reactor vessel probes, we find
that the property was not “readily identifiable” as of December
31, 1985.
iii. Permits and Regulatory Orders
Petitioner also contends that several permits and regulatory
orders readily identify its property: (1) The Final Hazardous
Waste Temporary Operating Permit (TOP) for the Martin plant,
effective November 30, 1982; (2) the TOP for the Port Everglades
plant, effective November 30, 1982; (3) Confirmatory Order EA-84-
55, dated July 11, 1984; and (4) an NRC Order Confirming Licensee
Commitments on Emergency Response Capability, dated February 23,
1984 (order confirming licensee commitments).
We disagree with petitioner. As an illustration, we look at
the TOP for the Port Everglades plant. Petitioner argues that
specific conditions 12 and 17 identified the equipment that FPL
Page: Previous 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011