Richard E. and Mary Ann Hurst - Page 34

                                     - 34 -                                           
          insurance premiums that HMI paid on her behalf.  And in                     
          1997, section 162(l)(1)(B) set that percentage at 40.10                     
               To reflect the foregoing and incorporate other                         
          stipulated issues,                                                          
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        under Rule 155.                               




















               10 The Commissioner also contends that the Hursts are liable           
          for a penalty under section 6662--either for negligence under               
          sections 6662(b)(1) and (c) or for substantial understatement un-           
          der sections 6662(b)(2) and (d).  Because we find almost entirely           
          in the Hursts’ favor, there is no substantial understatement.               
          The Hursts’ partial victory on the  minor issue of calculating              
          the taxable portion of Mrs. Hurst’s medical insurance premiums              
          showed no failure in reasonably complying with the Code on that             
          score, either.  The penalty is not sustained.  See sec. 6664(c);            
          sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.                                       






Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  

Last modified: May 25, 2011