- 39 - good faith attempt at reconstruction, petitioner merely rested on his claim that his records had been stolen. We believe that a taxpayer in petitioner’s position, facing challenged basis claims exceeding $1 million in the aggregate, would have made a more serious effort to reconstruct unless he knew that such efforts would tend to disprove his claims. The records of petitioner’s financial transactions that have been proffered in this case were generally obtained through the efforts of respondent alone and substantially rebut petitioner’s basis claims. In addition, petitioner’s claim that the records substantiating his basis had been stolen was undermined when, at trial, he proffered various invoices purporting to be substantiation of costs of later-built yachts that, upon close inspection, bore dates that fell within the time period for which records were claimed to have been taken. Moreover, the repeated instances where the dates on invoices proffered as evidence had been altered is further evidence of petitioner’s fraudulent intent. We also take account of the fact that petitioner was convicted of felony forgery in 1996 for forging the signatures of persons residing near the country club he operated on that business’s application for a liquor license. In an apparent effort to address the pervasive lack of records in this case, petitioner has also sought to portrayPage: Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011