- 42 - capital, he did not disclose their receipt to his return preparer so that adjustments pursuant to this treatment could be made. As for petitioner’s failure to report more than $200,000 in charter income that he admits receiving in 1994 and 1995, or a finder’s fee exceeding $85,000 that he admits receiving in 1995, petitioner has not even offered an explanation, other than his general claim of impairment. We accordingly sustain respondent’s determination of fraud for 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. A taxpayer is liable for a civil fraud penalty on a deficiency that arises when the taxpayer carries back a fraudulent loss. Toussaint v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-25. Therefore, it follows from our conclusion regarding fraud for 1994 that the underpayment in 1991 was also due to fraud, as the underpayment in 1991 resulted from the carryback of a fraudulent loss from 1994. The fraud penalty for 1991 is therefore also sustained.24 To reflect the foregoing, Decisions will be entered under Rule 155. 24 Our conclusion that the underpayments for 1991, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 were attributable to fraud disposes of petitioner’s claim that the period of limitations for assessment of 1991, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 income taxes has expired, see sec. 6501(c)(1); Badaracco v. Commissioner, 464 U.S. 386, 394-396 (1984), as well as respondent’s allegations in the alternative that petitioner is liable for accuracy-related penalties under sec. 6662(a) for the years in issue.Page: Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
Last modified: May 25, 2011