Tommy Ho Ching Cheng - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          America account).  The remaining three accounts were not in                 
          petitioner’s name but were subject to his control:  (1) “Bona               
          Trust” account at Cathay Bank (the Bona Trust account); (2) “Amex           
          Hospitality” account at Citizens Bank (the Amex Hospitality                 
          account); and (3) the “Amex Professional Services Group” account            
          at East West Bank (the Amex Services account).                              
               Petitioner did not make estimated tax payments or file a               
          Federal income tax return for 1996.                                         
          B.   Criminal Tax Investigation                                             
               Petitioner was the subject of a criminal investigation                 
          regarding his 1995 tax return and his failure to file tax returns           
          for 1993, 1994, and 1996.  The criminal investigation was                   
          conducted by Special Agent Fred Bautista (Special Agent                     
          Bautista).  As a result of the investigation, criminal charges              
          were filed against petitioner, one count under section 7201 for             
          an attempt to evade or defeat tax in 1995 and three counts under            
          section 7203 for willful failure to file tax returns in 1993,               
          1994, and 1996.  On October 12, 2001, petitioner pleaded guilty             
          to the charges.  As part of the plea agreement, petitioner                  
          admitted to receiving income of at least $645,253 in 1996.2                 
          Petitioner was sentenced to 33 months on the count under section            


               2  The plea agreement was under seal at the time of trial              
          and was not considered by the Court.  See infra p. 17.  However,            
          this admission by petitioner as part of the plea agreement was              
          established by independent evidence.  See infra p. 14.                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011