- 5 -
initially calendared for the Court’s Los Angeles trial session
beginning September 8, 2003. On August 4, 2003, respondent filed
a motion to continue, which was granted on August 27, 2003. On
August 8, 2003, petitioner’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw
as counsel, which was granted on August 27, 2003. From August
27, 2003 through March 16, 2005, petitioner proceeded pro se.
The case was recalendared for the Court’s Los Angeles trial
session beginning March 15, 2004. On March 1, 2004, petitioner
filed a motion to continue, stating: “The Petitioner moves this
Honorable Court to grant * * * [a motion to continue] due to: a.
Incarceration[;] b. To hire an attorney[;] c. Review records
with C.P.A.[; and] d. Receive bank records.” Petitioner’s motion
was granted on March 2, 2004.
The case was recalendared for the Court’s Los Angeles trial
session beginning October 4, 2004. On August 20, 2004,
petitioner filed his second motion to continue, asking the Court
to grant his motion “due to the following(s) [sic]: 1. Currently
Incarcerated at the Federal Prison[;] 2. To retain/hire an
Attorney[;] Review records/files with the C.P.A.[; and] 4.
Receive Bank records.” Petitioner’s motion was granted on
September 14, 2004.
The case was recalendared for the Court’s Los Angeles trial
session beginning March 14, 2005. On February 28, 2005,
petitioner filed his third motion to continue, asking the Court
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011