Jean-Remy Facq and Jennifer Huff-Facq - Page 13

                                        -13-                                          
               C.   Exception Treating Certain Transfers as the Grant of an           
                    Option                                                            
               An exception to the general rule treats certain exercises of           
          options and receipts of shares as the grant of another option               
          instead of a transfer of shares.  Sec. 1.83-3(a)(2), Income Tax             
          Regs.  The exception treats the transaction as another option               
          where the amount paid for the exercise is a debt secured by the             
          shares on which there is no personal liability.  Id.  Whether a             
          transaction is viewed in substance as the grant of an option                
          rather than a transfer depends on the facts and circumstances.              
          Id.  This analysis includes factors such as the type of property            
          involved, the extent to which the risk the property will decline            
          in value has been transferred, and the likelihood that the                  
          purchase price will be paid.  Id.                                           
               Petitioners argue that their situation is the same as that             
          described in section 1.83-3(a)(7), Example (2), Income Tax Regs.            
          (Example 2), where an employee pays his or her employer for                 
          shares by giving the employer a note for the purchase price on              
          which the employee has no personal liability.  See sec. 1.83-               
          3(a)(7), Example (2), Income Tax Regs.  Petitioners contend that            
          because the employee in Example 2 is treated as having received             
          an option, petitioners should also be treated as having received            
          an option.                                                                  
               Petitioners argue the key factor to be considered is whether           
          an employee has capital at risk.  If the employee has no capital            
          at risk, they argue, the transaction is in substance the grant of           
          an option regardless of whether the debt is to the employer or to           




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011