Elizabeth Giles - Page 46

                                     - 46 -                                           
          Gavilan Hills, is not significant enough to overcome the                    
          other factors.                                                              
               For these and all other reasons stated herein, we find                 
          that petitioner’s horse activity was not engaged in for                     
          profit within the meaning of section 183.  Therefore,                       
          respondent’s determination that petitioner may not deduct                   
          losses from that activity is sustained.                                     
          B.   Accuracy-Related Penalty Under Section 6662                            
               Respondent determined that petitioner is liable for                    
          accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a) for 1999                   
          and 2000.13  Section 6662(a) imposes a penalty in the amount                
          of 20 percent on the portion of the underpayment to which                   
          the section applies.  As relevant to this case, the penalty                 
          applies to any portion of the underpayment that is                          
          attributable to any substantial understatement of income                    
          tax.  Sec. 6662(b)(2).  There is a “substantial                             
          understatement of income tax” if the amount of the                          
          understatement exceeds the greater of 10 percent of the tax                 
          required to be shown on the tax return or $5,000.  Sec.                     
          6662(d)(1)                                                                  
               Section 7491(c) requires the Commissioner to carry the                 
          burden of production with regard to penalties.  Higbee v.                   

               13  As previously noted, respondent has conceded that                  
          petitioner is not liable for an accuracy-related penalty for                
          2001.                                                                       





Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011