Howard J. Kaplan and Brenda L. Kaplan, et al. - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
               not be considered the property of KQC while the lease                  
               was still in effect.  Accordingly, KQC’s deduction may                 
               be limited to the fair market value of the property at                 
               the time of the donation excluding the renovations made                
               by Texas.                                                              
               DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS                                                
               The predominant issue is that of establishing ownership                
               of the leasehold improvements at the time of transfer.                 
               There are two positions on this:  a) the leasehold                     
               improvements immediately vested in KQC when made,                      
               subject only to the possessory rights of Texas under                   
               the lease agreement or b) the leasehold improvements do                
               not become the property of KQC until termination of the                
               lease agreement.                                                       
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
               KQC had a basis only of approximately $125,000 in the                  
               property when they donated it to Texas.  KQC made no                   
               investment in the significant improvements made by                     
               Texas and had no depreciable interest in them.  There-                 
               fore, based on the numerous case law and opinions of                   
               the Service discussed above, significant risk ensues as                
               to whether or not the Service will allow KQC a full                    
               fair market value charitable contribution deduction.                   
               Lease Terms                                                            
               Additionally, the specific terms of the lease should be                
               considered in determining ownership of the leasehold                   
               improvements.  As enumerated in the facts above,                       
               Kaplan’s law firm has provided what they believe to be                 
               provisions of the lease agreement that support the                     
               interpretation that ownership resided with KQC.  It is                 
               important to note a few facts regarding these provi-                   
               sions.  In the event of a total condemnation, the lease                
               agreement shall also terminate.  Accordingly, ownership                
               in the improvements may be interpreted to reside with                  
               KQC as a result of the termination of the lease rather                 
               than as a result of the condemnation.  Additionally,                   
               while the lease agreement does include all improvements                
               in the description of property owned by KQC, this same                 
               section states that KQC agrees to “let” and Texas                      
               agrees to take from KQC “said property”.  This state-                  
               ment therefore does not clearly indicate ownership of                  
               leasehold improvements made during the term of the                     
               lease agreement. * * * The last provision provided by                  





Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011