Zalman Melnik and Lea Melnik - Page 51

                                       - 51 -                                         
               The uncontroverted record establishes that petitioners                 
          relied on Mr. Pennoni, who was the driving force behind the                 
          planning of the annuity transactions and who assured petitioners            
          that there was a reasonable basis for the income tax reporting of           
          the private annuity transactions and the HouTex stock sale.                 
               We conclude that, under the circumstances, petitioners’                
          reliance on Mr. Pennoni was reasonable, that petitioners had                
          reasonable cause for the underpayment, and that petitioners acted           
          in good faith with respect to the underpayment within the meaning           
          of section 6664(c)(1).  Consequently, we hold that petitioners              
          are not liable for the section 6662 accuracy-related penalty.               
          III.  Other Arguments                                                       
               We have considered the remaining arguments of both parties             
          for results contrary to those expressed herein, and we conclude             
          that those arguments, to the extent not discussed above, are                
          without merit or that it is not necessary to reach those                    
          arguments.                                                                  
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                  Decisions will be entered           
                                             under Rule 155.                          












Page:  Previous  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  

Last modified: May 25, 2011